Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020). Conceptual clarification of evolution as an interdisciplinary science. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/vr4t5 – OpenEvo

Skip to content

Learning Hub
Labs
- Educational Design Lab
- Community Science Lab
Bases
- TeachingBase
- ProjectBase
About

Learning Hub
Labs
- Educational Design Lab
- Community Science Lab
Bases
- TeachingBase
- ProjectBase
About

LiteratureBase

Conceptual clarification of evolution as an interdisciplinary science

Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020). Conceptual clarification of evolution as an interdisciplinary science. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/vr4t5

Abstract

Evolutionary theory in the 21st century has been embraced, albeit with varying degrees of controversy and consensus, across wide ranging disciplines. From biology and anthropology, to medicine, psychology, economics, sustainability science, computer science, and many more, core concepts of heritable variation and selection have been utilized by scientists across academia to understand change in the natural and social world. This article aims to provide evolution educators with a short review of current discourse in evolution science and a conceptual clarification of core concepts in evolutionary theory, in the service of promoting deeper and transferable understanding of these concepts in evolution education.

Link to Publication

Publication Type Preprint
Relevant learning goals Conceptual Thinking, Evolutionary Thinking, Interdisciplinary Thinking, Metacognitive Competency, Nature of Science, Systems Thinking

Related Lesson Materials

Cultural evolution (lesson plan)

Students explore the concept of cultural evolution by comparing it to genetic evolution based on a number of concepts, and explore why cultural evolution is so important in our species.

Analogy table – Comparing genetic and cultural evolution

Causal maps on the evolution of human traits

All causal maps on human evolution in one Google slide file

Structure of Knowledge Diagrams

Simple diagrams can help us map and understand the structures of knowledge in our world.

Causal mapping

Causal mapping helps us reflect on the interdependent relationships within complex systems

« »

Related Literature

Biological and Cultural Evolution: Similar but Different

Read now

Mesoudi, A. (2007). Biological and Cultural Evolution: Similar but Different. Biological Theory, 2 (2), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.119

Ever since The Origin of Species, but increasingly in recent years, parallels and analogies have been drawn between biological and cultural evolution, and methods, concepts, and theories that have been developed in evolutionary biology have been used to explain aspects of human cultural change. Many others, however, while accepting the need for some form of evolutionary approach to culture, have consistently emphasized the differences between biological and cultural evolution, with these differences often presented as being problematic for existing evolutionary analyses of culture. Here I argue that this is largely a false debate, given that its protagonists agree on the majority of key points. Apparent disagreement may stem partly from simple differences in emphasis, and partly from the diversity of both biological and cultural evolutionary processes.

Cultural Evolutionary Theory and the Significance of the Biology-Culture Analogy

Read now

Stanley, S. (2021). Cultural Evolutionary Theory and the Significance of the Biology-Culture Analogy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 51(2), 193-214.

Throughout the literature on Cultural Evolutionary Theory (CET) attention is drawn to the existence and significance of an analogy between biological phenomena and socio-cultural phenomena (the “biology-culture analogy”). Mesoudi (2017) seems to argue that it is the accuracy of the analogy, and the magnitude of accurate instances of this analogy at work, which provides warrant for an evolutionary approach to the study of socio-cultural phenomena, and, thus, for CET. An implication of this is that if there is evidence to suggest that the analogy is not accurate, or that there aren’t many cases where it is accurate, this would constitute evidence to reject an evolutionary approach to the study of socio-cultural phenomena. As such, opponents of CET raise objections highlighting the weakness of the biology-culture analogy. These objections, in turn, have standard replies in the literature that serve to reinforce the realism of the biology-culture analogy. Curiously, this situation would appear to support a position in the philosophy of social science called “Ontology Matters” (Lauer 2019). It is the view that social ontology can contribute to the empirical success of the social sciences (among which I include CET) by providing an accurate account of what there is in the domain of the social world which can be used to generate better explanations and/or predictions of social phenomena. If ontology matters, in this sense, perhaps this can help to clarify and resolve the dispute regarding the realism of the biology-culture analogy. In turn, perhaps this can help us determine what warrant there is for CET. However, I think this situation is indicative of severe confusion and misunderstanding as to the significance of the biology-culture analogy. This confusion is caused by inattention to two things. First, the useful distinction between it’s methodological, epistemological, and ontological significance. Second, the abstract (ontologically minimalist) nature of Darwinian evolution by natural selection. By drawing attention to these two things, I hope to take the sting out of, and deflate the significance of, disputes regarding the accuracy of the analogy, for both proponents and opponents of CET, as well as to bring into contact a classical dispute in the philosophy of social science with some relevant aspects of theoretical biology.

OpenEvo is an educational innovation project from the Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

Learning Hub
Labs
- Educational Design Lab
- Community Science Lab
Bases
- TeachingBase
- ProjectBase
About

Learning Hub
Labs
- Educational Design Lab
- Community Science Lab
Bases
- TeachingBase
- ProjectBase
About

Evolve the future of education with us!

Creative Commons (CC-BY-SA) 2022- OpenEvo

Imprint